BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Year 2008 - 2009

April Mounce
Reponsible Person

Janel Grider
Contact Person

 Approved :
5/22/2008
Date

Members or Committee:
Angela Parnell
Angie Sumner
Lisa Thomas
Shovan Miller
Carter Stewart
April Mounce

Executive Summary
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY
Mission Statement: Our mission statement is "We believe in and encourage the development of necessary skills and attitudes for students to reach their academic potential and become citizens of good character." Stakeholders began in August reviewing the past mission statement. Revisions were made during several faculty meetings and email communications with school stakeholders. After final additions and revisions were made to the mission statement in January 2008, the total staff and the school community reviewed it by means of the Burnside School Newsletter, staff meetings, email communications, grade level meetings, PTA meetings, and SBDM meetings.
Needs Assessment: The 2008-2010 Comprehensive School Improvement Planning teams were organized to assist in the needs assessment, action plan, and review of our current instructional strategies, goals, and objectives. The following were represented on all committees/team; teachers, Family Resource Center staff, instructional assistants, secretaries, parents, school nurse, community members, employers, and Central Office staff. During an intensive one-day analysis session, all committees used a district created needs assessment document to establish strengths and areas of need. Needs assessment data, student, parent and teacher surveys, including identification of achievement gaps, were reviewed at the November 2007 and January 2008 SBDM Meetings. The staff also used the Standards and Indicators for School Improvement to determine areas of need. School staff used the document to evaluate the level of implementation in nine areas. Follow up sessions continued in grade level meetings, explicit planning meetings and school wide common planning meetings. Goals:
During an intensive one-day analysis session, all committees used a district created needs assessment document to establish strengths and areas of need. Needs assessment data, including identification of achievement gaps, were reviewed at the November 2007 and January 2008 SBDM Meetings. The staff also used the Standards and Indicators for School Improvement to determine areas of need. School staff used the document to evaluate the level of implementation in nine areas. Follow up sessions continued in grade level meetings, explicit planning meetings and school wide common planning meetings. Once specific areas were identified as an area of need, school personnel (certified and classified), parents, and community members were chosen for their expertise to consult and provide input on the appropriate committees to develop action plans. These action plan committees used information from the Needs Assessment Document, Key Findings, Priority Needs, Causes, the 06-08 Improvement Plan, and the evaluation of Standards and Indicators for School Improvement (SISI) to write goals. These goals were utilized to write objectives in order to meet the goals. The goals and objectives were then used as a starting point to plan strategies/activities. Action Plans from the 2006-2008 CSIP were reviewed to determine successful strategies and to determine those that were determined not to be successful.
Evaluation:
We expect implementation of the plan to increase the effectiveness of instructional practices and improve student learning. This will aid in achieving the ultimate goal in 2014, which is - all students performing at the proficient level. The SBDM council reviewed drafts of the components and estimates for cost during the March 2008 meeting. The review of the plan has been accomplished through the following approaches. First, we utilized deliberations and discussions at faculty meetings, grade level meetings, school wide common planning meetings and content area meetings. Second, an announcement at SBDM meetings, PTA meetings, in the Burnside newsletter, and the county newspaper reported the plan was available for review by any interested stakeholder. The review encouraged comments and suggestions. Third, an internal review session was conducted with our school review team. Fourth, Central Office staff and the Kentucky Department of Education conducted an external review. The SBDM will officially adopt the 2008-2010 Comprehensive School Improvement Plan during the April 2008 meeting. In order to ensure the evaluation and planning process, The SBDM council will review and act on recommendations made in the plan. The Action Component Committees will continue to meet and complete Implementation/Impact Checks monthly. They will use this information to refine and change the plan if necessary. During the 2008-2010 school years, adjustments, revisions, and changes will be made as needed to ensure the goals are met in order to improve student achievement and student learning.
Stakeholders:
The following were represented on all committees/teams; teachers, Family Resource Center staff, instructional assistants, secretaries, parents, school nurse, community members, employers, and Central Office staff. Committee meetings were conducted where stakeholders provided necessary input.

Component: Arts Humanities
Component Manager:

Date: 9/4/2008
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY

Component: Learning Climate
Component Manager:
April Mounce
Date: 1/5/2009
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY
Priority Need: Our student attendance for the 2007 school year was 95.84. It has decreased over the last few months of the 2008 school year due to a variety of factors.
Goal: By May 2009, there will be a 1-2% increase in student attendance.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Attendance Reports 5/30/2009 96.5
Teacher Surveys 5/30/2009 96.5


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NA The attendance committee will involve stakeholders when identifying incentives and ideas to improve student and staff attendance.Incentives will be purchased in order to increase student/staff attendance. Goff 8/20/2008 2/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student attendance percentages.
2   Family Resource Center staff will make home visits to families with high absenteeism. Goff 7/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
3,000 FRC
I Increased student attendance percentages.
3   The Family Resource Center will conduct parent education classes on nutrition, hygiene, and/or other health related issues. Goff 9/1/2008 3/30/2010
   
400 FRC
I Improved health of families.
4   The school will provide parent workshops (i.e., Paired Reading, Everyday Math, AR, Great Leaps, Character Education, BTL). Mounce 10/1/2008 3/1/2010
   
400 PTA
I Increased parental involvement in student academies and understanding of school programs.
5   The school will send postcards to students monthly for significant attendance, academic performance or behavior. Mounce 8/15/2008 5/1/2010
   
300 General Fund
I Increased school communication.
6   School staff will recognize students monthly for attendance and academic achievement. Mounce 9/1/2008 5/5/2010
   
500 General Fund
500 PTA
500 Title I
I Increased student attendance, increased student achievement, increased student self esteem.
7          
   
   

Component: Math
Component Manager:

Date: 1/5/2009
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY

Component: Reading
Component Manager:
Donna Petrey
Date: 1/5/2009
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY
Priority Need: In May 2007, our school's Reading Index was 97.5 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2007, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading was 7 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2009 our school's Reading Index will increase by 1.25 for a total Reading Index of 98.75 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice will decrease by -1 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Reading of 6 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2009 our students will reach 80 percent mastery on the Pulaski Assessment of Reading.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT 10/15/2009 98.75
Pulaski Assessment of Reading 5/30/2009 80


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1   Teachers will apply professional development for differentiated instruction and management strategies during classroom instruction. Petrey 8/1/2008 1/30/2010
   
500 Reading First
I Implementation of instructional strategies.
2   At-risk first grade students will be served through Reading Recovery by a certified teacher. Petrey 8/4/2008 5/10/2010
   
25,000 Reading First
25,000 Title I
I Improved reading skills of students
3 NCLB At-risk students will be offered academies or tutoring sessions in an effort to accelerate student learning in reading. Gaunce 10/1/2008 3/30/2010
   
14,000 ESS
I Increased student learning/achievement
4 Both At-risk students will be served through the Great Leaps in Reading program and receive interventions in their area of need using Scott Foresman Intervention kit. Cochran 8/10/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning.
5   Teachers of each grade level will meet bi-monthly with the principal, curriculum specialist and the Reading First Coach to discuss assessment, instruction, and curriculum needs. Cochran/Petrey 8/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Improved communication among school stakeholders
6   Teachers of each grade level will meet weekly to discuss student needs, flexible grouping, and assessment issues. Cochran/Petrey 8/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
7   Teachers in all grades will implement common assessment strategies using: Learning Checks, standardized tests, KCCT Coach, released items, and BTL reports. Cochran 8/30/2008 4/10/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
8   Students will receive instruction that is aligned to Core Content, Program of Studies, grounded in research based and that is discussed among schools to eliminate gaps. Mounce 8/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
9   Teachers of each grade level will make instructional adjustments monthly or as needed using assessment results including, GRADE, DIBELS, PAR, IOWA, learning checks, BTL reports, etc. Cochran/Petrey 8/1/2008 4/20/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
10   Students will be provided various vocabulary instructional strategies using KASC vocabulary(including but not limited to word wall, games, puzzles, ActivStudio Flipcharts, & others). Cochran 8/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
1,000 Title I
I Increased student learning / achievement
11   School staff will recognize students monthly for academic achievement. Mounce 9/1/2008 5/1/2010
   
500 General Fund
500 Title I
500 PTA
I Improved student academic self esteem
12 Both Students who are behind in learning to read, struggling learning concepts, or having difficulty with particular skills will be referred to the Response to Intervention Team. This team will meet with the teacher reviewing records, student work and work with the teacher to meet the individual student's needs. Mounce 8/1/2008 3/1/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Improved student performance
13   Teachers will receive feedback on reading instruction from the principal, curriculum specialist and reading first coach based on observations, student assessment results, and student work. Mounce 8/4/2008 5/20/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning
14   The administrative staff and classroom teachers at all grade levels will meet each quarter to analyze student work using the Kentucky Association Protocol for Analyzing Student Work. Mounce 9/15/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning
15   Results from this analysis will be used to conference with students on their individual performance and suggestions for how to improve will be given. Cochran 9/10/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student understanding of experiences
16   Teachers will participate in the vertical curriculum alignment process with Southern Middle School teachers. Mounce 8/1/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
IP Increased teacher understanding of curricular needs
17   Teachers in grades 3-5 will assess student learning using a school developed learning check each 9 weeks. Teachers will also analyze this data and make instructional changes as needed. Mounce 10/15/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning

Component: Social Studies
Component Manager:
Malissa Atkinson
Date: 1/5/2009
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY
Priority Need: In May 2007, our school's Social Studies Index was 86.1 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2007, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Social Studies was 8.01 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2009 our school's Social Studies Index will increase by 6.95 for a total Social Studies Index of 93.05 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice will decrease by -1.505 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Social Studies of 6.505 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT 10/15/2009 93.05
Learning Checks 3/1/2009 80


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1   Each grade level will instruct students using materials that are aligned with the Core Content, curriculum documents, and Program of Studies. Mounce 8/1/2008 5/15/2010
   
1,000 Title I
I Increased student achievement
2   Teachers will use common social studies vocabulary that has been developed school wide during instruction and posted in the classroom. Cochran 8/1/2008 5/20/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
3   All teachers will receive professional development in the development and use of open response questions and will implement the required instructional open response at each grade level. Mounce 8/1/2008 4/15/2010
   
1,000 PD
I Increased student achievement
4   Fourth grade teachers will collaborate with Fifth grade teachers three times a year to plan for instruction in Social Studies. Mounce 8/1/2008 5/1/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
5   Fifth grade teachers will collaborate to develop and implement open response items in Social Studies biweekly. Atkinson 8/1/2008 4/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
6   5th grade classroom teachers will collaborate monthly with special area teachers in Social Studies and Arts & Humanities. Parnell 8/1/2008 4/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
7   Students will be provided various vocabulary instructional strategies KASC Vocabulary(including but not limited to vocabulary, games, learning checks, & others). Cochran 8/1/2008 4/1/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
8   School staff will recognize students monthly for academic achievement. Mounce 9/1/2008 5/1/2010
   
500 Title I
500 General Fund
500 PTA
I Improved student academic self esteem
9   The administrative staff and classroom teachers at all grade levels will meet each quarter to analyze student work using the Kentucky Association Protocol for Analyzing Student Work. Results from this analysis will be used to conference with students on their individual performance and suggestions for how to improve will be given. Mounce 9/15/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning
10   Teachers will receive feedback on social studies instruction from the principal, curriculum specialist and reading first coach based on observations, student assessment results, and student work. Mounce 8/4/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning
11   Teachers in grades 3-5 will assess student learning using a school developed learning check each 9 weeks. Teachers will also analyze this data and make instructional changes as needed. Mounce 10/15/2008 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning

Component: Writing
Component Manager:
Olivia King
Date: 1/5/2009
Name:
BURNSIDE ELEMENTARY
Priority Need: In May 2007, our school's Writing Index was 97.3 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2007, the percentage of students scoring Novice in On Demand Writing was 37 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2007, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing Portfolio was 1 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2009 our school's Writing Index will increase by 1.35 for a total Writing Index of 98.65 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice will decrease by -16 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Writing of 21 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice will decrease by Met Goal for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Writing of 3 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT 10/15/2009 98.35
Learning Check 5/30/2009 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1   Teachers will use common writing vocabulary and terminology throughout all grade levels. Cochran 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
2   All teachers will receive professional development on on-demand writing skills, techniques, and open response question development and implement learned strategies. J. Grider 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
1,000 PD
I Increased student achievement
3   At risk students will be offered tutoring sessions to improve their on-demand and portfolio writings. Gaunce 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
5,000 ESS
I Increased student achievement
4   Teachers will be trained and will implement Six Traits Writing in all grade levels. Cochran 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
750 PD
I Increased student achievement
5   Teachers of grade 4 and 5 will collaborate scoring and analyzing on-demand and portfolio writing of student work. Mounce 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
6   Teachers will receive training in portfolio development and portfolio scoring. King 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
300 Title I - PD
I Increased student achievement
7   Staff members will mentor and conference students during the writing portfolio process. King 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student achievement
8   Students will be provided various vocabulary instructional strategies (including but not limited to vocabulary, games, learning checks, & others). Mounce 8/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
500 Title I
I Increased student achievement
9   School staff will recognize students monthly for academic achievement. Mounce 9/1/2008 5/30/2009
   
500 PTA
500 General Fund
500 Title I
I Improved student academic self esteem
10   The administrative staff and classroom teachers at all grade levels will meet each quarter to analyze student work using the Kentucky Association Protocol for Analyzing Student Work. Results from this analysis will be used to conference with students on their individual performance and suggestions for how to improve will be given. Mounce 9/15/2008 5/15/2009
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
11   Teachers will receive feedback on writing instruction from the principal, curriculum specialist and reading first coach based on observations, student assessment results, and student work. Mounce 8/4/2008 5/30/2009
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement
12   Teachers in grades 3-5 will assess student learning using a school developed learning check each 9 weeks. Teachers will also analyze this data and make instructional changes as needed. Mounce 10/15/2008 5/15/2010
   
0 No Funding
I Increased student learning / achievement